Owning property still signals success in India. Parents nudge, brokers persuade, and colleagues boast about “appreciation.” Yet, when the dust settles, property’s math often looks different from the dream. Between stamp duty, brokerage, repair costs, and years of EMIs, the real return can shrink quickly. Meanwhile, reits—listed trusts that own income-producing properties—offer a way to access commercial real estate without blocking large capital. This piece takes a clear-eyed look at property’s true costs and compares them with options such as reits and reit investing, so an investor’s net worth isn’t quietly drained by avoidable leaks.
For many households, a first purchase begins with emotion: security, status, or a desire to “lock money” in something tangible. Behavioral biases—FOMO, home-bias, anchoring to a neighborhood—rush decisions. The trap appears later: a stretched down payment, rising maintenance, and a long EMI tail. If the flat remains vacant for months or the tenant negotiates hard, expected cash flows wobble. A wise real estate investment separates life needs (primary residence) from return expectations (an investment property). When the driver is emotion, not numbers, an investor might mistake a lifestyle choice for a money-making asset.
Most “8–10% rent + big appreciation” claims ignore frictional costs. Consider a typical example for context:
Item | Amount (₹) |
Purchase price | 1,00,00,000 |
Stamp duty, registration, brokerage (~8%) | 8,00,000 |
All-in cost | 1,08,00,000 |
Gross annual rent (₹25,000 × 12) | 3,00,000 |
Less: vacancy (10%) | –30,000 |
Less: maintenance + society + insurance | –80,000 |
Less: property tax, small repairs | –30,000 |
Net annual income | 1,60,000 |
Net yield on cost | ≈1.5% |
This table excludes loan interest. With an 8–9% home-loan rate, leveraged IRR can trail fixed-income options. By contrast, reits disclose yields, occupancy, and debt, distribute income regularly, and can be bought or sold in minutes.
In many Indian metros, rental yields hover near 2–3% on market value, even before upkeep. When loan rates sit materially higher, carry turns negative—EMIs exceed rent. The “appreciation will fix it” story assumes perfect timing and uninterrupted cycles. If prices stagnate for a few years while costs rise, returns compress further. Transparent instruments like reits publish portfolio-wide yields and pass-throughs, helping investors see the true income picture instead of relying on optimistic assumptions.
EMIs front-load interest. For several early years, equity barely builds while interest dominates cash outflow. Add intermittent repairs, whitewashing between tenants, and broker fees for every churn. If income dips or a job move forces a quick sale, illiquidity bites: distress discounts, delayed transactions, or tax complications. A single, large, illiquid bet can weigh on flexibility—especially for salaried families targeting education goals, emergencies, or entrepreneurship. Spreading risk through bonds, deposits, and reit investing can keep cash flows predictable and assets liquid.
There are sensible cases:
Property can deliver pride and comfort, but it is seldom a magic escalator for wealth. The math rewards those who buy for use, not speculation; who budget for every frictional cost; and who refuse to overload leverage. For steady income and flexibility, reits and reit investing often provide cleaner exposure to the underlying asset class, plus liquidity and disclosure standards that single flats cannot match. Treat real property as a considered allocation, not a default. A balanced plan—mixing bonds, equity, and reits—can grow net worth with fewer sleepless nights. For anyone still determined to buy, the best real estate investment is the one whose numbers add up even on a rainy day.
Direct property—no. But reits trade like shares, so small tickets are possible. That is why many retail investors begin with reit investing before considering a full unit purchase.
Results vary sharply by city and micro-market. Once stamp duty, maintenance, and vacancy are included, long-term returns often mirror conservative asset classes. Transparent reits help reveal true income and growth rather than headline prices.
It depends on purpose and math. For a home to live in, yes—if EMIs fit safely. As a pure investment, compare net yield and liquidity with bonds and reits; sometimes market instruments win.
Returns change with rent growth, occupancies, interest rates, and unit prices. Investors evaluate distribution yield plus potential capital movement. For newcomers, start small, study disclosures, and follow real estate investment tips like diversifying across assets and avoiding excessive leverage.
Disclaimer : Investments in debt securities/ municipal debt securities/ securitised debt instruments are subject to risks including delay and/ or default in payment. Read all the offer related documents carefully.